CBSE Class 7 Mathematics Question 5 of 16

Operations with Integers — Question 5

Back to all questions
5
Question
Do you remember the Collatz Conjecture from last year? Try a modified version with integers. The rule is — start with any number; if the number is even, take half of it; if the number is odd, multiply it by -3 and add 1; repeat. An example sequence is shown below. Try this with different starting numbers: (-21), (-6), and so on. Describe the patterns you observe.
Answer

(a) Following the rules for the sequence starting with -7. The rule is if even, take half, if odd, multiply by -3, and add 1. Start with -7 (odd) [(-7) × (-3)] + 1 = 21 + 1 = 22 (even) then 22 ÷ 2 = 11 (odd) then 11 × (-3) + 1 = -33 + 1 = -32 (even) then (-32) ÷ 2 = -16 (even) then (-16) ÷ 2 = -8 (even) then (-8) ÷ 2 = -4 (even) then (-4) ÷ 2 = -2 (even) then (-2) ÷ 2 = – 1 (odd) then [(-1) × (-3)] + 1 = 4 (even) then 4 ÷ 2 = 2 (even) then 2 ÷ 2 = 1 (odd) (b) (i) Now for the starting number -21 (odd) then [(-21) × (-3)] + 1 = 63 + 1 = 64 (even) then 64 ÷ 2 = 32 (even) then 32 ÷ 2 = 16 (even) then 16 + 2 = 8 (even) then 8 ÷ 2 = 4 (even) then 4 ÷ 2 = 2 (even) then 2 ÷ 2 = 1 (odd) then 1 × (-3) + 1 = -2 (even) then (-2) ÷ 2 = -1 (odd) then [-1 × (-3)] + 1 = 4 (even) then 4 ÷ 2 = 2 (even) then 2 ÷ 2 = 1 (odd) then 1 × (-3) + 1 = -2 (even) Hence the sequence for -21 is (ii) For the sequence, the starting number is -6 -6 is even then -6 + 2 = -3 (odd) then [(-3) × (-3)] + 1 = 9 + 1 = 10 (even) then 10 ÷ 2 = 5 (odd) 5 × (-3) + 1 = -15 + 1 = -14 (even) then -14 ÷ 2 = -7 (odd) [(-7) × (-3)] + 1 = +21 + 1 = 22 (even) then 22 ÷ 2 = 11 (odd) then [11 × (-3)] + 1 = -33 + 1 = -32 (even) then -32 ÷ 2 = -16 (even) then -16 ÷ 2 = -8 (even) then -8 ÷ 2 = -4 (even) then -4 ÷ 2 = -2 (even) then (-2) ÷ 2 = -1 (odd) then [(-1) × (-3)] + 1 = 3 + 1 = 4 (even) then 4 ÷ 2 = 2 (even) then 2 ÷ 2 = 1 (odd) then 1 × (-3) + 1 = -2 Hence, the sequence is Observation: For numbers like -21, -6, etc., the sequences eventually reach a repeating loop of -2, -1, 4, 2, 1, -2. All starting numbers end up in this cycle.

Chapter Overview: Integers

This chapter covers multiplication and division of integers, extending the operations learned in Class VI. Students learn sign rules for multiplication and division, properties like closure, commutative, associative, and distributive, and apply integer operations to real-world contexts like temperature changes and financial transactions.

Exam Weightage: ~6 marks | Difficulty: Medium

Key Formulas

Formula When to Use
(+) × (+) = (+), (+) × (-) = (-)Sign rule for multiplication
(-) × (+) = (-), (-) × (-) = (+)Sign rule for multiplication
a × (b + c) = a×b + a×cDistributive property
a × 1 = a; a × 0 = 0Identity and zero property
Division sign rules same as multiplicationDivision of integers

Must-Know Concepts

  • Sign rules: same signs → positive, different signs → negative
  • Closure property holds for multiplication but NOT for division:
  • Commutative and associative properties hold for multiplication but NOT for division:
  • Division by zero is undefined:
  • Distributive property: a × (b + c) = a×b + a×c

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • Writing (-2) × (-3) = -6 instead of +6
  • Claiming division is commutative
  • Dividing by zero and writing 0 as the result

Scoring Tips

  • Master sign rules first — they apply to both multiplication and division
  • Use the pattern approach to understand why negative × negative = positive
  • Practice with number line for visual understanding
  • Memorize: even number of negatives = positive result

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is negative × negative = positive?

Look at the pattern: (-3)×3=-9, (-3)×2=-6, (-3)×1=-3, (-3)×0=0. Each step adds 3. So (-3)×(-1)=3, (-3)×(-2)=6. The pattern forces the result to be positive.

Why can't we divide by zero?

Division is the inverse of multiplication. If 6÷0 = x, then x×0 should equal 6. But anything times 0 is 0, never 6. So no answer exists — division by zero is undefined.

Does closure hold for division of integers?

No. For example, 7÷2 = 3.5, which is not an integer. So integers are not closed under division.